Aful Performer 5+2 VS Binary Dynaquattro
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Aful Performer 5+2 and Binary Dynaquattro use 2DD+4BA+1Planar and 4DD driver setups respectively. Aful Performer 5+2 costs $229 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Binary Dynaquattro is $31 more expensive. Aful Performer 5+2 holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 7.8). Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Aful Performer 5+2 | Binary Dynaquattro |
|---|---|---|
| Mids | 8 | 6 |
| Treble | 7 | 6 |
| Soundstage | 8 | 7 |
| Dynamics | 7 | 8 |
| Tonality | 7.5 | 6.8 |
| Technicalities | 7 | 6 |
Jaytiss Reviews Comparison
Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by
8.5
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Aful Performer 5+2 lands as a hybrid of the beloved Performer 5 and the punchier Explorer. The unboxing is the familiar P5 affair—same case, same style of tips—nothing flashy, but solid. The shell mirrors the P5 in size with a comfy little stabilizing wing that locks in well. No metal nozzle or front filter here, yet tip retention is secure and hassle-free. The flat 2-pin socket is straightforward, and the stock cable feels thick and supple with a reliable chin slider and handy red/blue channel markers. Overall: understated build, great ergonomics, daily-driver ready.
Sonically, this one aims neutral with a very distinct top end—clean, dynamic, incisive. Think switching from black-and-white to color; cymbals and overtones pop with a slightly crunchy/pristine edge that energizes detail without turning harsh on good recordings. Bass isn’t about sheer quantity; it’s about slam and dynamics—quick on the draw, well-controlled, and satisfying when called upon. Vocals sit a notch forward, microdetail is strong, and the overall presentation is coherent, clear, and technical with convincing stage, resolution, and imaging. Not a treble-shy or bass-bombed tuning—more a refined all-rounder for those who want clarity and bite.
Versus the original P5, the 5+2 fixes the missing “air” and soft edges, trading them for crisper transients and better extension. Compared with Explorer (a value champ), the 5+2 brings superior upper-treble reach, detail, and vocal focus. Against Performer 8 and Cantor, it feels more visceral—the P8 is smoother and more relaxed, while Cantor pulls finer microdetail but with less bass slam. Sets like Dino Quattro or J’s Estrella bring bigger fun or treble theatrics, yet the 5+2’s balance and everyday versatility win more often. Net take: a neutral-leaning, highly technical upgrade that stands tall in its bracket—easy to recommend to anyone chasing clarity, speed, and controlled impact over pure warmth or excess bass.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Buy Aful Performer 5+2 on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $213
Buy Aful Performer 5+2 on HiFiGO
Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by
7.8
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Binary Dynaquattro comes dressed to impress: a larger, comfy shell that sits better than it looks, though seating can be a touch finicky. Accessories feel thoughtfully chosen—a Pelican-style case, usable tips, and a standout cable with a screw-lock modular plug (ships with 4.4 mm) and a handsome gunmetal vibe; the chin slider actually works and handling is supple with a slight rubbery grip. Build notes versus peers: it’s notably bigger than Gizaudio Chopin (flat 2-pin vs. Chopin’s recessed) and a bit larger than AFUL Magic One, but overall comfort remains solid.
The tuning aims dead at a preferred target: rich, deep sub-bass with restrained mid-bass for a clean foundation, energetic mids, and a deliberate 4–6 kHz dip to keep fatigue low; air is “good for the price,” with upper-treble sparkle the only wish-list item. Technicals read 9.5/10 bass, 9.5/10 mids, highs a notch behind, plus nice imaging, pleasing note weight, and a natural stage/resolution balance. Versus the field: deeper, higher-quality bass than Chopin; competes surprisingly well with the pricier Thieaudio Oracle MK3; more engaging than the neutral-leaning Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk; preferred over Project M thanks to truer target adherence; trades blows with Dunu Da Vinci (Da Vinci = a touch more upper air; Dynaquattro = better bass/mids). Close kinship with Juzear 61T (choose Dynaquattro for richer bass, 61T for a more inoffensive, cheaper take), and consider Letshuoer Cadenza 4 if similar mids with less bass is the brief.
In practice this is a fun, fatigue-lite, bass-quality-first all-rounder with tuning doing the heavy lifting—“tuning trumps technicality” in the best way. The package, from the utilitarian accessories to the modular cable, matches the sonic story: high value, target-true, and easy to recommend for music and gaming (9/10). Call it a five-star pick and a “100-point overall” vibe for listeners who want clean sub-bass authority, lively mids, and a relaxed upper-mid/low-treble that invites longer sessions without dulling the experience.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Buy Binary Dynaquattro on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $194.99
Buy Binary Dynaquattro on HiFiGO
Aful Performer 5+2 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+4BA+1Planar
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Brand: AFUL Top AFUL IEMs
Price (Msrp): $229
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Binary Dynaquattro Details
Driver Configuration: 4DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $260
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Aful Performer 5+2 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.
Average Technical Grade
A-- It manages detail and layering well enough, even if the stage feels only moderately sized. You get a clear sense of left and right, if not depth.
Binary Dynaquattro Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- It sounds pleasant overall, with some uneven spots that hint at room for refinement. Vocals remain pleasant despite the imperfections.
Average Technical Grade
B- The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Aful Performer 5+2 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewBinary Dynaquattro User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS