AME Mousa VS Canpur CP622B
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
AME Mousa and Canpur CP622B use 13BA+2BC and 6BA+2EST+2BC driver setups respectively. AME Mousa costs $4,500 while Canpur CP622B costs $3,500. AME Mousa is $1,000 more expensive. Canpur CP622B holds a slight 0.4-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 8.4). Canpur CP622B has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Canpur CP622B has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, AME Mousa has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Canpur CP622B has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | AME Mousa | Canpur CP622B |
|---|---|---|
| Mids | 6 | 7 |
| Treble | 6 | 7 |
| Soundstage | 7 | 7.5 |
| Dynamics | 9 | 8 |
| Tonality | 7 | 7.4 |
| Technicalities | 6 | 7 |
Jaytiss Reviews Comparison
AME Mousa reviewed by
8
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
AME Mousa goes all-in on extravagance: a 15-driver array (BA stack plus two bone conductors) in a massive, impeccably finished shell with a faceplate that hints at Damascus-steel swirls. The $4,500 package feels ultra-premium—weighty presentation box, desk display case, metal tip cards (fancy but a bit fiddly), and a tidy stock cable that looks good yet lacks a chin slider. Fit will depend on ear size: the shells are very thick and heavy, though ergonomics and finish are smooth. Overall unboxing and build scream luxury.
Sonically it hits a warm, energizing V-shape with impactful bass, dynamic highs, and full-bodied vocals; sibilance is minimal and the set shines at higher volumes. Tuning isn’t neutral—expect a 1 kHz dip and lively 4–6 kHz energy—so it thrills more than it analyzes, and can edge toward fatigue over marathon sessions. Versus peers, it feels richer and more rambunctious than neutral “meta-target” options (think Storm/K4 style sets), less air-starved than darker tunings like CP622B, and more bass-driven than something like Annihilator while not as modular or chameleon-like as Grand Maestro. The takeaway: a specialist, endgame-flavored IEM for listeners chasing slam, note-weight, and engagement over strict neutrality—highly enjoyable if the price and shell size aren’t deal-breakers, and best auditioned first given its bold fit and flavor.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Canpur CP622B reviewed by
8.4
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Canpur CP622B makes a striking first impression with a premium case, tidy accessories, and a shimmering faceplate—but the shell is huge, bordering on chunky, and can push fit comfort limits over longer sessions. Sonically, it hits with authoritative sub-bass and impressive extension, yet the overall presentation skews dark; vocals sit a touch recessed, with a wish for more 1.5–3 kHz presence and a bit more upper-air sparkle. Out of the box it already thumps, but a light EQ lift to upper mids and bass can coax out more vibration and energy.
On graphs and in A/Bs, the CP622B comes off as a specialist: fantastic low-end texture (bass judged around 9.5 for level), solid resolution and stage, but imaging feels slightly constrained by the muted 3 kHz region. Compared with peers, FATfreq Grand Maestro reads like the safer “one-and-done” all-rounder with more flair up top; Aful Cantor delivers comparable presence at a fraction of the cost; Hisenior Mega5-EST Bass offers a friendlier fit and a tuning that can feel just a hair more balanced; and as a personal north star, Elysian Annihilator 2023 still sets the bar for extension and excitement. Net: a fantastically built, bass-thrilling CP622B that shines with hip-hop/R&B and cinematic lows, but reads as niche and pricey—a connoisseur’s piece for big collections rather than a first-pick endgame.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
AME Mousa Details
Driver Configuration: 13BA+2BC
Tuning Type: Basshead
Price (Msrp): $4,500
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Canpur CP622B Details
Driver Configuration: 6BA+2EST+2BC
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Price (Msrp): $3,500
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
AME Mousa Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.
Average Technical Grade
B- The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Canpur CP622B Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- A smooth, agreeable balance keeps the presentation engaging without obvious flaws. Only sensitive ears will nitpick the bumps.
Average Technical Grade
A-- You get a controlled, composed performance, marrying decent clarity with a still-modest sense of space. A safe technical performer for the price bracket.
AME Mousa User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewCanpur CP622B User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS