CCA Trio VS Tangzu Waner 2

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

CCA Trio and Tangzu Waner 2 are in-ear monitors. CCA Trio costs $30 while Tangzu Waner 2 costs $25. CCA Trio is $5 more expensive. Tangzu Waner 2 holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5 vs 6.3). Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and CCA Trio has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
CCA Trio
5 /10
Jaytiss Score
Tangzu Waner 2
6.3 /10
Score gap: 1.3
Metric CCA Trio Tangzu Waner 2
Mids 5 6
Treble 3 5
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 5
Tonality 5 5.3
Technicalities 3 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough CCA Trio and Tangzu Waner 2 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

CCA Trio Details

Driver Configuration: 3DD

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Brand: CCA Top CCA IEMs

Price (Msrp): $30

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Tangzu Waner 2 Details

CCA Trio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble D
The upper range behaves inconsistently, blending dullness with sudden glare. You'll notice sharp spikes alongside dips.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.

Tangzu Waner 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.

CCA Trio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Waner 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer