EPZ 530 VS Softears RSV MK II

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

EPZ 530 and Softears RSV MK II are 5BA in-ear monitors. EPZ 530 costs $700 while Softears RSV MK II costs $700. Softears RSV MK II holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 9.2). Softears RSV MK II has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Softears RSV MK II has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and Softears RSV MK II has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
EPZ 530
8 /10
Jaytiss Score
Softears RSV MK II
9.2 /10
Score gap: 1.2
Metric EPZ 530 Softears RSV MK II
Mids 6 8
Treble 7 8
Soundstage 8 7.8
Dynamics 7 9
Tonality 7 8.2
Technicalities 7 8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ 530 and Softears RSV MK II reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

EPZ 530 Details

Driver Configuration: 5BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $700

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears RSV MK II Details

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Expect an inviting tonal blend that adapts well to genres while staying largely composed. It strikes a nice blend of warmth and clarity.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Technical chops are reliable, pairing tidy separation with a soundstage that stays conservative. Micro-detail is decent, though never spotlighted.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A-
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A+
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.

Softears RSV MK II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • It delivers a coherent, natural timbre that remains captivating across genres. Acoustic instruments sound lifelike and textured.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Layering is confident and precise, backed by imaging that locks elements firmly in place. Micro-details peek through without sounding forced.
Mids A+
Midrange quality is superb, rich with resolving power and transparency. Micro-details leap out effortlessly.
Treble A+
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics S
Dynamics reach reference class, delivering lightning-fast transients and perfect contrast. Every transient feels lightning fast.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Softears RSV MK II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer