Softears Volume S VS Epz K9

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Softears Volume S and Epz K9 use 2DD+2BA and 1DD+8BA driver setups respectively. Softears Volume S costs $320 while Epz K9 costs $299. Softears Volume S is $21 more expensive. Softears Volume S holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 7.5). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 3-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Epz K9 has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and Softears Volume S has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Softears Volume S
8.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
Epz K9
7.5 /10
Score gap: 1.0
Metric Softears Volume S Epz K9
Mids 9 6
Treble 8 6
Soundstage 8 7
Dynamics 5 7
Tonality 7.5 6.5
Technicalities 8 6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Softears Volume S and Epz K9 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Epz K9 reviewed by

2025-09-21
Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
A little bit too much lower trebble, but it's still a good balanced set.
Youtube Video Summary

EPZ K9 brings a flashy spec sheet and premium feel: a 9-driver hybrid (1DD+8BA) dressed in a world-class shell that fits securely, vents properly, and looks gorgeous with its blue-white case. The stock cable offers swappable 3.5↔4.4 termination and a steady chin slider, though the fabric sheathing and barely visible L/R markers are quirks. Originally teased near $300 and now closer to $400, the package screams polish more than compromise.

Sonically, this is a V-shaped tuning with rich bass, thick lower mids, and extra energy in the 3–6 kHz band that can make stick hits and sibilants feel a touch sharp. The midrange clarity is only decent and the upper-air/treble extension is just okay, but staging comes across pleasantly open. Graph comparisons paint the picture: versus EPZ’s own P50 (safer, flatter upper mids) and the more majestic, warm-lean V of the EPZ 530, K9 pushes that presence region a few dB higher. Sets like Afu Dawn X flatten that band while extending air; Softears Volume offers a very similar profile but even more 5–6 kHz energy; and options around this price—Magic Top Pro, Yu9 Chua—show alternate takes with either dipped presence or stronger bass/1 kHz support.

In practice, K9 aims for excitement: weighty bass, a forward upper-mid/low-treble bite, and a lively stage. Listeners craving a crisp, energetic V will find plenty to enjoy, while those sensitive to brightness or seeking mid clarity and airy refinement may prefer the P50, 530, or similarly priced competitors. Stunning build and respectable performance, but the tuning choices make it a taste-dependent recommendation rather than a universal pick.

Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Softears Volume S Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $320

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Epz K9 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+8BA

Tuning Type: Warm, W-Shaped

Price (Msrp): $299

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears Volume S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Mids S
Expect a benchmark mid band that blends flawless accuracy with captivating presence. Vocals float in a perfectly defined space.
Treble A+
Highs sound shimmering and endless, with exquisite smoothness and detail. Air and sparkle feel endless.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.

Epz K9 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Mids B
Midrange presence is good, delivering clear vocals and solid texture. Voices come through with pleasing clarity.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics A-
Expect excellent punch and micro-detail that render rhythmic shifts effortlessly. It keeps up with complex rhythmic swings.
Soundstage A-
All dimensions bloom together, producing an expansive venue that feels carefully rendered. You can map the ensemble easily.

Softears Volume S User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Syren
9.2

A well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.
Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.
Makavelian
7.2

RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.

Tuning: A- Tech: A- Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A-
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.
Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSV

Epz K9 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer