Juzear Clear VS EPZ Q5

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Juzear Clear and EPZ Q5 are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while EPZ Q5 costs $50. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 4.5). Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Juzear Clear
5.8 /10
Jaytiss Score
EPZ Q5
4.5 /10
Score gap: 1.3
Metric Juzear Clear EPZ Q5
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 4
Soundstage 6 6
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 4.8 4.5
Technicalities 4 4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and EPZ Q5 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

EPZ Q5 reviewed by

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Nice Bass response, great graph, overall clean set.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

Juzear Clear Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs

Price (Msrp): $50

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

EPZ Q5 Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $50

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

EPZ Q5 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EPZ Q5 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer