ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra VS EPZ Q5

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and EPZ Q5 are in-ear monitors. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43 while EPZ Q5 costs $50. EPZ Q5 is $7 more expensive. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (6 vs 4.5). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge.

Jaytiss Score

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

6 /10

Jaytiss Score

EPZ Q5

4.5 /10

Score gap: 1.5

Metric	ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra	EPZ Q5
Mids	5	5
Treble	5	4
Soundstage	6	6
Dynamics	6	2
Tonality	5	4.5
Technicalities	5	4

Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and EPZ Q5 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by

6 Reviewer Score

C+ Tuning

C+ Tech

Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

Using this affiliate link for ordering your ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on HiFiGO

EPZ Q5 reviewed by

4.5 Reviewer Score

C Tuning

C- Tech

Nice Bass response, great graph, overall clean set.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $43

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $50

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

C+

A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C+

An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.

Mids C+

The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.

Treble C+

Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.

Dynamics B

The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.

Soundstage B

Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.

EPZ Q5 Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-

Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.

Mids C+

Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.

Treble C-

Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.

Dynamics E+

Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.

Soundstage B

Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...

0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros

Example pro 1
Example pro 2

Cons

Example con 1
Example con 2

No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EPZ Q5 User Reviews