Aful Explorer VS Faaeal Tulip

Aful Explorer and Faaeal Tulip are in-ear monitors. Aful Explorer costs $120 while Faaeal Tulip costs $100. Aful Explorer is $20 more expensive. Aful Explorer holds a decisive 3.3-point edge in reviewer scores (7.3 vs 4). Aful Explorer has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Aful Explorer has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Aful Explorer has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Aful Explorer has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Jaytiss Score

Aful Explorer

7.3 /10

Jaytiss Score

Faaeal Tulip

4 /10

Score gap: 3.3

Metric	Aful Explorer	Faaeal Tulip
Mids	5	3
Treble	7	5
Soundstage	6	4
Dynamics	7	4
Tonality	6.3	4
Technicalities	7	5

Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Aful Explorer and Faaeal Tulip reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Aful Explorer reviewed by

7.3 Reviewer Score

B Tuning

A- Tech

The mids still upset me, but it sounds magical.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

Using this affiliate link for ordering your Aful Explorer or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $107.99

Buy Aful Explorer on HiFiGO

Faaeal Tulip reviewed by

2025-09-03

4 Reviewer Score

C- Tuning

C+ Tech

It's weird. I don't get it.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: D Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Soundstage: C-

Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Top Neutral with Bass Boost IEMs

Brand: AFUL Top AFUL IEMs

Price (Msrp): $120

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$107.99

Buy Aful Explorer on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $100

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Aful Explorer Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

A-

You get a controlled, composed performance, marrying decent clarity with a still-modest sense of space. A safe technical performer for the price bracket.

Mids C+

The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.

Treble A-

The treble is exquisitely tuned, combining crystal detail with relaxed delivery. Micro-details emerge effortlessly.

Dynamics A-

You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.

Soundstage B

You can map the ensemble with confidence thanks to solid spacing and coherent depth layering. Ambient effects feel believable.

Faaeal Tulip Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

C-

Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

C+

Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.

Mids D

Mid frequencies swing wildly, colouring vocals and instruments unpredictably. Instruments trade places unpredictably.

Treble C+

The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.

Dynamics C-

It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.

Soundstage C-

Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.

Aful Explorer User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...

0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros

Example pro 1
Example pro 2

Cons

Example con 1
Example con 2

No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Faaeal Tulip User Reviews