Aful Cantor VS FatFreq Scarlet Mini

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Aful Cantor and FatFreq Scarlet Mini use 14BA and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Aful Cantor costs $800 while FatFreq Scarlet Mini costs $800. Aful Cantor holds a decisive 2.7-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 5.8). Aful Cantor carries a user score of 8.5. Aful Cantor has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge, Aful Cantor has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge and Aful Cantor has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Aful Cantor
8.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
FatFreq Scarlet Mini
5.8 /10
Score gap: 2.7
Metric Aful Cantor FatFreq Scarlet Mini
Mids 8 4
Treble 9 5
Soundstage 8 7
Dynamics 5 5
Tonality 7.5 4.8
Technicalities 9 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Aful Cantor and FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Aful Cantor reviewed by

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech
Maybe best detailed set, fit is extremely difficult.
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Cantor delivers a balanced and neutral sound signature, praised for its exceptional upper air, treble extension, and pristine clarity. While the bass offers sufficient dynamics without being thunderous, and female vocals sound natural, some listeners might desire a touch more punch in the upper mids (around 2-3kHz) and find a slight peak in the 4-6kHz region occasionally noticeable. The premium build quality stands out, featuring a unique and stunning "star night" face plate, a thick but comfortable shell with a slender nozzle, and excellent accessories. These include a slightly microphonic but otherwise nice-looking flat two-pin cable and an exceptionally plush case typically found on far more expensive IEMs.

Graph comparisons reveal the Cantor's tuning shares similarities with models like the Moondrop Blessing 2: Dusk and the AFUL Explorer, but it distinguishes itself with superior detail retrieval and dynamics. It competes impressively against significantly pricier offerings like the Elysian Annihilator in technical performance, offering a smoother presentation with slightly less sub-bass focus. The overall sonic presentation is described as sophisticated, refined, and highly engaging, creating a sense of music surrounding the listener. Minor tuning preferences aside – wishing for a bit more upper mid presence and slightly less energy around 4-6kHz and 8kHz – the core sound quality is highly regarded.

Representing strong sonic value despite its price point, the Cantor earns a high ranking for its unique and beautiful design, premium feel, and exceptional technical performance. While acknowledging excellent cheaper options like the AFUL Explorer exist, the Cantor justifies its cost with its detailed, airy presentation and overall package. It's highly recommended for those seeking a neutral, high-performing IEM, though a demo is advised given the investment. Ultimately, the AFUL Cantor is considered a treasure, fulfilling over a year of anticipation with its beautiful aesthetics and uniquely engaging sound.

Mids: A+ Treble: S Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Aful Cantor or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $687

Buy Aful Cantor on HiFiGO

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by

Jaytiss 5.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Ohh this set is a special love affair with BASS. Not Neutral lol.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Aful Cantor Details

Driver Configuration: 14BA

Tuning Type: Vocal-focused

Brand: AFUL Top AFUL IEMs

Price (Msrp): $800

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

FatFreq Scarlet Mini Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Basshead

Price (Msrp): $800

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Aful Cantor Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • It resolves with authority, pairing lightning-fast transients with holographic staging. Ambient cues wrap around with ease.
Mids A+
It offers a luxurious, resolving midrange that captures micro-detail beautifully. Every vocal inflection is captured.
Treble S
Expect an astonishingly pure top end that reveals every nuance without fatigue. Nothing in the highs feels exaggerated.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage A+
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.

FatFreq Scarlet Mini Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble C+
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.

Aful Cantor User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Nexus
9

Excellent overall clarity and imaging, though fit demands can be a deal-breaker

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S
Pros
Tonally balanced signature with superb detail retrieval
Cons
Requires deep insertion and has a large shell that may challenge fit for some
Aeris
8

Well-rounded flagship IEM with refined tuning and tech for the money.

Tuning: A+ Tech: S- Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-
Pros
Exceptional clarity and tonal balance that punches above its price bracket.
Cons
Requires precise tip fit for best performance and subtle treble can be fatiguing at high volumes.

FatFreq Scarlet Mini User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer