EPZ 530 VS FatFreq Scarlet Mini

EPZ 530 and FatFreq Scarlet Mini use 5BA and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. EPZ 530 costs $700 while FatFreq Scarlet Mini costs $800. FatFreq Scarlet Mini is $100 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 2.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 5.8). EPZ 530 has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and EPZ 530 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Jaytiss Score

EPZ 530

8 /10

Jaytiss Score

FatFreq Scarlet Mini

5.8 /10

Score gap: 2.2

Metric	EPZ 530	FatFreq Scarlet Mini
Mids	6	4
Treble	7	5
Soundstage	8	7
Dynamics	7	5
Tonality	7	4.8
Technicalities	7	5

Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ 530 and FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

EPZ 530 reviewed by

8 Reviewer Score

A- Tuning

A- Tech

It does some things very well. Very good item.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ 530 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $443

Buy EPZ 530 on Linsoul

FatFreq Scarlet Mini reviewed by

5.8 Reviewer Score

C Tuning

C+ Tech

Ohh this set is a special love affair with BASS. Not Neutral lol.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C- Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Driver Configuration: 5BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $700

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$443

Buy EPZ 530 on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Basshead

Top Basshead IEMs

Price (Msrp): $800

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

A-

Expect an inviting tonal blend that adapts well to genres while staying largely composed. It strikes a nice blend of warmth and clarity.

Average Technical Grade

A-

Technical chops are reliable, pairing tidy separation with a soundstage that stays conservative. Micro-detail is decent, though never spotlighted.

Mids B

It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.

Treble A-

Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.

Dynamics A-

You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.

Soundstage A+

Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.

FatFreq Scarlet Mini Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C+

The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.

Mids C-

The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.

Treble C+

Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.

Dynamics C+

Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.

Soundstage A-

Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...

0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros

Example pro 1
Example pro 2

Cons

Example con 1
Example con 2

No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FatFreq Scarlet Mini User Reviews