Tangzu Waner 2 VS KZ Taurus

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Tangzu Waner 2 and KZ Taurus are in-ear monitors. Tangzu Waner 2 costs $25 while KZ Taurus costs $25. Tangzu Waner 2 holds a clear 0.5-point edge in reviewer scores (6.3 vs 5.8). Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, KZ Taurus has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Tangzu Waner 2
6.3 /10
Jaytiss Score
KZ Taurus
5.8 /10
Score gap: 0.5
Metric Tangzu Waner 2 KZ Taurus
Mids 6 5
Treble 5 6
Soundstage 5 5
Dynamics 5 4
Tonality 5.3 4.8
Technicalities 5 6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tangzu Waner 2 and KZ Taurus reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Tangzu Waner 2 Details

KZ Taurus Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs

Price (Msrp): $25

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Tangzu Waner 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.

KZ Taurus Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Soundstage C+
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.

Tangzu Waner 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ Taurus User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer