Softears Volume S VS MYER SL224

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Softears Volume S and MYER SL224 use 2DD+2BA and 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar driver setups respectively. Softears Volume S costs $320 while MYER SL224 costs $270. Softears Volume S is $50 more expensive. MYER SL224 holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 8.6). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, MYER SL224 has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and MYER SL224 has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Softears Volume S
8.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
MYER SL224
8.6 /10
Score gap: 0.1
Metric Softears Volume S MYER SL224
Mids 9 7
Treble 8 7
Soundstage 8 8.5
Dynamics 5 8
Tonality 7.5 7.6
Technicalities 8 7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Softears Volume S and MYER SL224 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Softears Volume S Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $320

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

MYER SL224 Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar

Tuning Type: Neutral

Price (Msrp): $269.99

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears Volume S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Mids S
Expect a benchmark mid band that blends flawless accuracy with captivating presence. Vocals float in a perfectly defined space.
Treble A+
Highs sound shimmering and endless, with exquisite smoothness and detail. Air and sparkle feel endless.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.

MYER SL224 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • A competent technical showing keeps separation intact while delivering modest staging. It feels tidy even when recordings stack layers.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A+
It captures both explosive hits and delicate shifts with lifelike realism. Micro-dynamics shimmer through the mix.
Soundstage S-
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.

Softears Volume S User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Syren
9.2

A well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.
Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.
Makavelian
7.2

RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.

Tuning: A- Tech: A- Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A-
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.
Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSV

MYER SL224 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer