ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra VS ND 001 Nano

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and ND 001 Nano are in-ear monitors. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43 while ND 001 Nano costs $50. ND 001 Nano is $7 more expensive. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 3-point edge in reviewer scores (6 vs 3). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better mids with a 3-point edge, ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Jaytiss Score

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

6 /10

Jaytiss Score

ND 001 Nano

3 /10

Score gap: 3.0

Metric	ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra	ND 001 Nano
Mids	5	2
Treble	5	2
Soundstage	6	5
Dynamics	6	2
Tonality	5	3
Technicalities	5	2

Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and ND 001 Nano reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by

6 Reviewer Score

C+ Tuning

C+ Tech

Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

Using this affiliate link for ordering your ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on HiFiGO

ND 001 Nano reviewed by

3 Reviewer Score

D Tuning

E+ Tech

It's mids are a bit off for my liking.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $43

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $50

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

C+

A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C+

An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.

Mids C+

The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.

Treble C+

Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.

Dynamics B

The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.

Soundstage B

Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.

ND 001 Nano Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

E+

A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.

Mids E+

A hollow mid band strips body from instruments and voices. Instrumental harmonics fade too quickly.

Treble E+

Treble leans dark, softening cymbals and trimming extension. Brightness is replaced with a murky haze.

Dynamics E+

Expect constrained dynamics that blur the edges of quieter details. It struggles to render sudden changes.

Soundstage C+

You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...

0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros

Example pro 1
Example pro 2

Cons

Example con 1
Example con 2

No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

ND 001 Nano User Reviews