Softears Volume S VS Prisma Audio Azul

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Softears Volume S and Prisma Audio Azul are in-ear monitors. Softears Volume S costs $320 while Prisma Audio Azul costs $300. Softears Volume S is $20 more expensive. Softears Volume S holds a decisive 3.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 5.3). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Softears Volume S has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Softears Volume S
8.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
Prisma Audio Azul
5.3 /10
Score gap: 3.2
Metric Softears Volume S Prisma Audio Azul
Mids 9 5
Treble 8 5
Soundstage 8 6
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 7.5 4.3
Technicalities 8 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Softears Volume S and Prisma Audio Azul reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Prisma Audio Azul reviewed by

Jaytiss 5.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Severly lacks bass.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

Softears Volume S Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $320

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Prisma Audio Azul Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: Neutral

Price (Msrp): $300

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears Volume S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Mids S
Expect a benchmark mid band that blends flawless accuracy with captivating presence. Vocals float in a perfectly defined space.
Treble A+
Highs sound shimmering and endless, with exquisite smoothness and detail. Air and sparkle feel endless.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.

Prisma Audio Azul Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics E+
Expect constrained dynamics that blur the edges of quieter details. It struggles to render sudden changes.
Soundstage B
You can map the ensemble with confidence thanks to solid spacing and coherent depth layering. Ambient effects feel believable.

Softears Volume S User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Syren
9.2

A well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.
Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.
Makavelian
7.2

RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.

Tuning: A- Tech: A- Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A-
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.
Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSV

Prisma Audio Azul User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer