Simgot EW200 VS QKZ x HBB Khan

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Simgot EW200 and QKZ x HBB Khan are in-ear monitors. Simgot EW200 costs $39 while QKZ x HBB Khan costs $40. QKZ x HBB Khan is $1 more expensive. Simgot EW200 holds a decisive 2.2-point edge in reviewer scores (5.5 vs 3.3). Simgot EW200 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Simgot EW200 has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge and Simgot EW200 has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Simgot EW200
5.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
QKZ x HBB Khan
3.3 /10
Score gap: 2.2
Metric Simgot EW200 QKZ x HBB Khan
Mids 5 4
Treble 5 1
Soundstage 5 5
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 4.5 3.3
Technicalities 5 1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Simgot EW200 and QKZ x HBB Khan reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Simgot EW200 Details

QKZ x HBB Khan Details

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs

Price (Msrp): $40

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Simgot EW200 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics C+
Dynamics feel competent, bringing energy without the finest detail. It carries energy without sounding aggressive.
Soundstage C+
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.

QKZ x HBB Khan Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Instrument separation collapses instantly, burying nuances and leaving everything in a gray blur. Layered arrangements collapse into a messy haze.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble E-
Expect severely attenuated treble that leaves textures subdued. Everything sounds veiled and muted.
Dynamics E+
Subtle shifts disappear, with transients lacking bite or urgency. Drum hits arrive without conviction.
Soundstage C+
Stage expands beyond the shoulders and finally hints at layers, though vertical cues stay muted. Depth cues begin to emerge.

Simgot EW200 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

QKZ x HBB Khan User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer