QX-over VS Tangzu Waner 2

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

QX-over and Tangzu Waner 2 are in-ear monitors. QX-over costs $30 while Tangzu Waner 2 costs $25. QX-over is $5 more expensive. Tangzu Waner 2 holds a decisive 5-point edge in reviewer scores (1.3 vs 6.3). Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better mids with a 5-point edge, Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge, Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge and Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better soundstage with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
QX-over
1.3 /10
Jaytiss Score
Tangzu Waner 2
6.3 /10
Score gap: 5.0
Metric QX-over Tangzu Waner 2
Mids 1 6
Treble 1 5
Soundstage 2 5
Dynamics 1 5
Tonality 1.3 5.3
Technicalities 1 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough QX-over and Tangzu Waner 2 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

QX-over Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $30

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Tangzu Waner 2 Details

QX-over Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E-
  • Expect a discordant presentation where frequency clashes ruin any chance of relaxed listening. It struggles to render a cohesive musical picture.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Instrument separation collapses instantly, burying nuances and leaving everything in a gray blur. Layered arrangements collapse into a messy haze.
Mids E-
Expect vocals to feel buried, with midrange detail swallowed by haze. You'll keep raising the volume to compensate.
Treble E-
Upper frequencies retreat, causing detail and brilliance to disappear. You may think your source is covered.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage E+
Limited spatial presentation with minimal width, leaving instruments clumped together without depth. Stage width barely extends past the ears.

Tangzu Waner 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.

QX-over User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Waner 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer