Seeaudio Bravery VS Softears Volume S

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Seeaudio Bravery and Softears Volume S use 4BA and 2DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Seeaudio Bravery costs $280 while Softears Volume S costs $320. Softears Volume S is $40 more expensive. Softears Volume S holds a decisive 3.5-point edge in reviewer scores (5 vs 8.5). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Softears Volume S has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Seeaudio Bravery
5 /10
Jaytiss Score
Softears Volume S
8.5 /10
Score gap: 3.5
Metric Seeaudio Bravery Softears Volume S
Mids 5 9
Treble 5 8
Soundstage 6 8
Dynamics 2 5
Tonality 5 7.5
Technicalities 5 8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Seeaudio Bravery and Softears Volume S reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Seeaudio Bravery reviewed by

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Just seems like another BA only set that lacks dynamics and punch.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

Seeaudio Bravery Details

Driver Configuration: 4BA

Tuning Type: Warm, V-Shaped

Brand: SeeAudio Top SeeAudio IEMs

Price (Msrp): $280

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears Volume S Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $320

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Seeaudio Bravery Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics E+
Dynamics remain compressed, muting nuance and softening impact. Climaxes never quite lift off.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

Softears Volume S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Mids S
Expect a benchmark mid band that blends flawless accuracy with captivating presence. Vocals float in a perfectly defined space.
Treble A+
Highs sound shimmering and endless, with exquisite smoothness and detail. Air and sparkle feel endless.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.

Seeaudio Bravery User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Softears Volume S User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Syren
9.2

A well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.
Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.
Makavelian
7.2

RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.

Tuning: A- Tech: A- Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A-
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.
Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSV

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer