Softears Volume S VS Aful Performer 8

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Softears Volume S and Aful Performer 8 use 2DD+2BA and 1DD+7BA driver setups respectively. Softears Volume S costs $320 while Aful Performer 8 costs $369. Aful Performer 8 is $49 more expensive. Softears Volume S holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 7.8). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge and Softears Volume S has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Softears Volume S
8.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
Aful Performer 8
7.8 /10
Score gap: 0.8
Metric Softears Volume S Aful Performer 8
Mids 9 7
Treble 8 7
Soundstage 8 8
Dynamics 5 5
Tonality 7.5 6.8
Technicalities 8 7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Softears Volume S and Aful Performer 8 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Softears Volume S Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $320

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Aful Performer 8 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+7BA

Tuning Type: Neutral

Brand: AFUL Top AFUL IEMs

Price (Msrp): $369

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears Volume S Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Mids S
Expect a benchmark mid band that blends flawless accuracy with captivating presence. Vocals float in a perfectly defined space.
Treble A+
Highs sound shimmering and endless, with exquisite smoothness and detail. Air and sparkle feel endless.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.

Aful Performer 8 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • The presentation feels orderly, balancing workable detail retrieval with acceptable imaging cues. It keeps momentum without smearing transients.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A-
The treble is exquisitely tuned, combining crystal detail with relaxed delivery. Micro-details emerge effortlessly.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
A panoramic, wraparound presentation suspends each element in a convincingly airy bubble. Instruments float with pinpoint spacing.

Softears Volume S User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Syren
9.2

A well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S-
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.
Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.
Makavelian
7.2

RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.

Tuning: A- Tech: A- Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A-
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.
Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSV

Aful Performer 8 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer