TangZu Wan'er S.G VS Fiio JD1

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

TangZu Wan'er S.G and Fiio JD1 are in-ear monitors. TangZu Wan'er S.G costs $21 while Fiio JD1 costs $25. Fiio JD1 is $4 more expensive. Fiio JD1 holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.8 vs 5). TangZu Wan'er S.G carries a user score of 5. TangZu Wan'er S.G has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and Fiio JD1 has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
TangZu Wan'er S.G
4.8 /10
Jaytiss Score
Fiio JD1
5 /10
Score gap: 0.3
Metric TangZu Wan'er S.G Fiio JD1
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 2
Soundstage 6 6
Dynamics 2 5
Tonality 4.8 5
Technicalities 4 2
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough TangZu Wan'er S.G and Fiio JD1 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

TangZu Wan'er S.G Details

Fiio JD1 Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: FiiO Top FiiO IEMs

Price (Msrp): $25

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

TangZu Wan'er S.G Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.

Fiio JD1 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • It sounds pleasant overall, with some uneven spots that hint at room for refinement. Vocals remain pleasant despite the imperfections.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • The presentation is claustrophobic and blurred, leaving simple arrangements sounding chaotic and lifeless. The presentation feels more like background noise than music.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble E+
The upper end is cloaked, leaving cymbals lacking shimmer and air. Overtones hide behind the midrange.
Dynamics C+
Dynamics feel competent, bringing energy without the finest detail. It carries energy without sounding aggressive.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
wpzdm
5

Gave to my wife

Pros
Good for its price
Cons
Feels muddy. Vocal a bit siblant

Fiio JD1 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer