Kiwi Ears Dolce VS TangZu Wan'er S.G

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Kiwi Ears Dolce and TangZu Wan'er S.G are in-ear monitors. Kiwi Ears Dolce costs $20 while TangZu Wan'er S.G costs $21. TangZu Wan'er S.G is $1 more expensive. Both score 4.8 from reviewers. TangZu Wan'er S.G carries a user score of 5. TangZu Wan'er S.G has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, Kiwi Ears Dolce has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and TangZu Wan'er S.G has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Kiwi Ears Dolce
4.8 /10
Jaytiss Score
TangZu Wan'er S.G
4.8 /10
Score gap: 0.0
Metric Kiwi Ears Dolce TangZu Wan'er S.G
Mids 5 5
Treble 3 4
Soundstage 5 6
Dynamics 4 2
Tonality 4.8 4.8
Technicalities 3 4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Kiwi Ears Dolce and TangZu Wan'er S.G reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Kiwi Ears Dolce Details

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: Kiwi Ears Top Kiwi Ears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $20

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

TangZu Wan'er S.G Details

Kiwi Ears Dolce Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble D
Treble response is uneven, jumping between dull spots and sharp peaks. Peaks poke out unpredictably.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage C+
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.

TangZu Wan'er S.G Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.

Kiwi Ears Dolce User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
wpzdm
5

Gave to my wife

Pros
Good for its price
Cons
Feels muddy. Vocal a bit siblant

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer