TangZu Wan'er S.G VS KZ Taurus

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

TangZu Wan'er S.G and KZ Taurus use 1DD and 2DD driver setups respectively. TangZu Wan'er S.G costs $21 while KZ Taurus costs $25. KZ Taurus is $4 more expensive. KZ Taurus holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (4.8 vs 5.8). TangZu Wan'er S.G carries a user score of 5. KZ Taurus has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, KZ Taurus has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and TangZu Wan'er S.G has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
TangZu Wan'er S.G
4.8 /10
Jaytiss Score
KZ Taurus
5.8 /10
Score gap: 1.0
Metric TangZu Wan'er S.G KZ Taurus
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 6
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 2 4
Tonality 4.8 4.8
Technicalities 4 6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough TangZu Wan'er S.G and KZ Taurus reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

TangZu Wan'er S.G Details

KZ Taurus Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs

Price (Msrp): $25

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

TangZu Wan'er S.G Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.

KZ Taurus Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Soundstage C+
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
wpzdm
5

Gave to my wife

Pros
Good for its price
Cons
Feels muddy. Vocal a bit siblant

KZ Taurus User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer