Tangzu Waner 2 VS TangZu Wan'er S.G

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Tangzu Waner 2 and TangZu Wan'er S.G are in-ear monitors. Tangzu Waner 2 costs $25 while TangZu Wan'er S.G costs $21. Tangzu Waner 2 is $4 more expensive. Tangzu Waner 2 holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (6.3 vs 4.8). TangZu Wan'er S.G carries a user score of 5. Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, Tangzu Waner 2 has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and TangZu Wan'er S.G has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Tangzu Waner 2
6.3 /10
Jaytiss Score
TangZu Wan'er S.G
4.8 /10
Score gap: 1.5
Metric Tangzu Waner 2 TangZu Wan'er S.G
Mids 6 5
Treble 5 4
Soundstage 5 6
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 5.3 4.8
Technicalities 5 4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tangzu Waner 2 and TangZu Wan'er S.G reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Tangzu Waner 2 Details

TangZu Wan'er S.G Details

Tangzu Waner 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.

TangZu Wan'er S.G Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.

Tangzu Waner 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
wpzdm
5

Gave to my wife

Pros
Good for its price
Cons
Feels muddy. Vocal a bit siblant

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer