Juzear Clear VS Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Juzear Clear and Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji costs $50. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 2-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 3.8). Juzear Clear has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Juzear Clear has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Juzear Clear
5.8 /10
Jaytiss Score
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji
3.8 /10
Score gap: 2.0
Metric Juzear Clear Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji
Mids 5 3
Treble 4 2
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 4
Tonality 4.8 3.8
Technicalities 4 2
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Juzear Clear Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs

Price (Msrp): $50

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Details

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Everything sounds flat and suffocated, with even elementary passages losing definition and energy. Expect little in the way of micro-details.
Mids D
Mid frequencies swing wildly, colouring vocals and instruments unpredictably. Instruments trade places unpredictably.
Treble E+
The upper end is cloaked, leaving cymbals lacking shimmer and air. Overtones hide behind the midrange.
Dynamics C-
Expect modest dynamics that keep music listenable without thrill. Micro-contrast is serviceable.
Soundstage C+
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer