Kefine Delci VS Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Kefine Delci and Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji are in-ear monitors. Kefine Delci costs $59 while Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji costs $50. Kefine Delci is $9 more expensive. Kefine Delci holds a decisive 1.7-point edge in reviewer scores (5.5 vs 3.8). Kefine Delci has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Kefine Delci has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Kefine Delci has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Kefine Delci has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Kefine Delci
5.5 /10
Jaytiss Score
Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji
3.8 /10
Score gap: 1.7
Metric Kefine Delci Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji
Mids 5 3
Treble 4 2
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 4
Tonality 4.5 3.8
Technicalities 4 2
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Kefine Delci and Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Kefine Delci Details

Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Details

Kefine Delci Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.

Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Everything sounds flat and suffocated, with even elementary passages losing definition and energy. Expect little in the way of micro-details.
Mids D
Mid frequencies swing wildly, colouring vocals and instruments unpredictably. Instruments trade places unpredictably.
Treble E+
The upper end is cloaked, leaving cymbals lacking shimmer and air. Overtones hide behind the midrange.
Dynamics C-
Expect modest dynamics that keep music listenable without thrill. Micro-contrast is serviceable.
Soundstage C+
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.

Kefine Delci User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Yu Xuan Ji User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer