EPZ 530 VS UM Stardust

EPZ 530 and UM Stardust are in-ear monitors. EPZ 530 costs $700 while UM Stardust costs $800. UM Stardust is $100 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 2.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8 vs 5.8). EPZ 530 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and EPZ 530 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Jaytiss Score

EPZ 530

8 /10

Jaytiss Score

UM Stardust

5.8 /10

Score gap: 2.2

Metric	EPZ 530	UM Stardust
Mids	6	5
Treble	7	5
Soundstage	8	7
Dynamics	7	5
Tonality	7	4.8
Technicalities	7	5

Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ 530 and UM Stardust reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

EPZ 530 reviewed by

8 Reviewer Score

A- Tuning

A- Tech

It does some things very well. Very good item.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ 530 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $443

Buy EPZ 530 on Linsoul

UM Stardust reviewed by

5.8 Reviewer Score

C Tuning

C+ Tech

Pillowy bass, bland. Just not great especially at this price.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Driver Configuration: 5BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $700

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$443

Buy EPZ 530 on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $800

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

A-

Expect an inviting tonal blend that adapts well to genres while staying largely composed. It strikes a nice blend of warmth and clarity.

Average Technical Grade

A-

Technical chops are reliable, pairing tidy separation with a soundstage that stays conservative. Micro-detail is decent, though never spotlighted.

Mids B

It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.

Treble A-

Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.

Dynamics A-

You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.

Soundstage A+

Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.

UM Stardust Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

C+

The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.

Mids C+

Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.

Treble C+

Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.

Dynamics C+

Dynamics feel competent, bringing energy without the finest detail. It carries energy without sounding aggressive.

Soundstage A-

The stage stretches in every direction, carving out clear three-dimensional pockets for each player. Placement accuracy impresses from the start.

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...

0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros

Example pro 1
Example pro 2

Cons

Example con 1
Example con 2

No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

UM Stardust User Reviews