NF RA05 Type-C - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (E Tier | 2.3/10)

IEMRanking.com Jaytiss Ranking NF RA05 Type-C
My Favorites

Summary

Reviewers consider the NF RA05 Type-C to be a package that asks for compromise at every turn and gives little back. It never quite locks in because comfort, tonality, and control all ask for forgiveness. After a week you start browsing alternatives.

NF RA05 Type-C Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $39

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Review

Jaytiss 2.3 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E- Tech
I think this set is only recommended for those who need it for the fit or eq.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: D

User Reviews

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Compare NF RA05 Type-C to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough NF RA05 Type-C reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Kiwi Ears Cadenza
Kiwi Ears Cadenza offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
Show Kiwi Ears Cadenza
 6.6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
Show Kbear KB02
 6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
Show ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
 6
NF RA05 Type-C vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
Show 7HZ G1
 5.5
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
Show Simgot EW200
 5.5
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Blon BL03
Blon BL03 offers better treble, soundstage and dynamics.
Show Blon BL03
 5.3
NF RA05 Type-C vs. KZ CRN
KZ CRN offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
Show KZ CRN
 3.8
NF RA05 Type-C vs. Moondrop SSP
Moondrop SSP offers better soundstage and mids.
Show Moondrop SSP
 3.3
NF RA05 Type-C vs. QKZ x HBB Khan
QKZ x HBB Khan offers better soundstage and dynamics.
Show QKZ x HBB Khan
 3.3
NF RA05 Type-C vs. KZ PR 2 x HBB
KZ PR 2 x HBB offers better soundstage and mids.
Show KZ PR 2 x HBB
 3.3
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • The tonal profile is unruly and tiring, forcing constant volume adjustments. Even spoken word sounds unnatural.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage D
The presentation sketches a narrow arc while leaving the vertical and frontal layers untouched. Complex mixes blur together quickly.

Footer