Juzear Clear VS Celestee Pandomonon 2.0

Juzear Clear and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 costs $60. Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 is $10 more expensive. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 4.5). Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge.

Jaytiss Score

Juzear Clear

5.8 /10

Jaytiss Score

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0

4.5 /10

Score gap: 1.3

Metric	Juzear Clear	Celestee Pandomonon 2.0
Mids	5	5
Treble	4	4
Soundstage	6	6
Dynamics	5	1
Tonality	4.8	4.5
Technicalities	4	4

Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Jaytiss Reviews Comparison

Juzear Clear reviewed by

5.8 Reviewer Score

C Tuning

C- Tech

This little dude is pretty, and hammers. Bass machine.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Using this affiliate link for ordering your Juzear Clear or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $49

Buy Juzear Clear on HiFiGO

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviewed by

4.5 Reviewer Score

C Tuning

C- Tech

Solid iem for those who enjoy a light bass shelf.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: B

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs

Price (Msrp): $50

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$49

Buy Juzear Clear on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $60

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-

Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.

Mids C+

It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.

Treble C-

The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.

Dynamics C+

You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.

Soundstage B

Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-

The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.

Mids C+

It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.

Treble C-

Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.

Dynamics E-

Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.

Soundstage B

Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...

0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros

Example pro 1
Example pro 2

Cons

Example con 1
Example con 2

No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Reviews