Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)

IEMRanking.com Jaytiss Ranking Celestee Pandomonon 2.0

Summary

Reviewers consider the Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 to be a situational choice that sits between reference and fun without claiming either. It reacts strongly to small changes and that keeps experimentation interesting. Consistency, however, remains out of reach.

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Details

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $60

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Review

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Solid iem for those who enjoy a light bass shelf.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: B

User Reviews

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Compare Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Apos x Community Rock Lobster offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.1
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.8
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
6.8
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro
Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro offers better dynamics and treble.
6
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Truthear x Crinacle Zero:Red
Truthear x Crinacle Zero:Red offers better dynamics and treble.
5.8
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics.
5.8
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics.
5.5
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. EPZ Q5 Pro V2
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 offers better dynamics and treble.
5.5
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.

Footer