Rhapsido Return VS Softears RSV MK II

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Rhapsido Return and Softears RSV MK II are in-ear monitors. Rhapsido Return costs $699 while Softears RSV MK II costs $700. Softears RSV MK II is $1 more expensive. Softears RSV MK II holds a decisive 5.9-point edge in reviewer scores (3.3 vs 9.2). Softears RSV MK II has significantly better mids with a 4-point edge, Softears RSV MK II has significantly better treble with a 7-point edge, Softears RSV MK II has significantly better dynamics with a 7-point edge and Softears RSV MK II has significantly better soundstage with a 1.8-point edge.

Insights

Jaytiss Score
Rhapsido Return
3.3 /10
Jaytiss Score
Softears RSV MK II
9.2 /10
Score gap: 5.9
Metric Rhapsido Return Softears RSV MK II
Mids 4 8
Treble 1 8
Soundstage 6 7.8
Dynamics 2 9
Tonality 3.3 8.2
Technicalities 1 8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Rhapsido Return and Softears RSV MK II reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Rhapsido Return Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $699

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Softears RSV MK II Details

Rhapsido Return Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Everything sounds flat and suffocated, with even elementary passages losing definition and energy. Expect little in the way of micro-details.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble E-
The top end feels muffled, with air and shimmer barely audible. Ambient reverb tails are chopped short.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.

Softears RSV MK II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • It delivers a coherent, natural timbre that remains captivating across genres. Acoustic instruments sound lifelike and textured.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Layering is confident and precise, backed by imaging that locks elements firmly in place. Micro-details peek through without sounding forced.
Mids A+
Midrange quality is superb, rich with resolving power and transparency. Micro-details leap out effortlessly.
Treble A+
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics S
Dynamics reach reference class, delivering lightning-fast transients and perfect contrast. Every transient feels lightning fast.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.

Rhapsido Return User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Softears RSV MK II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer