Rhapsido Return - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.3/10)

IEMRanking.com Jaytiss Ranking Rhapsido Return
My Favorites

Summary

Reviewers consider the Rhapsido Return to be a competent shell with a sound that blends into the background and stays there. It pairs average comfort with average isolation and average tone. That consistency is reliable, not inspiring.

Rhapsido Return Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $699

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Review

Jaytiss 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
E- Tech
Bright, hard for me to listen to.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

User Reviews

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Compare Rhapsido Return to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Rhapsido Return reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Rhapsido Return vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show Softears RSV MK II
 9.2
Rhapsido Return vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
Show Aful Cantor
 8.5
Rhapsido Return vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
 8.4
Rhapsido Return vs. Softears RSV
Softears RSV offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
Show Softears RSV
 8.3
Rhapsido Return vs. SymphonyEars PRE5TIGE
SymphonyEars PRE5TIGE offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
Show SymphonyEars PRE5TIGE
 8.1
Rhapsido Return vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show EPZ 530
 8
Rhapsido Return vs. Fiio FH19
Fiio FH19 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
Show Fiio FH19
 7.8
Rhapsido Return vs. FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
Show FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum
 7.8
Rhapsido Return vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show ORIVETI OH700VB
 7.8
Rhapsido Return vs. Symphonium Giant
Symphonium Giant offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
Show Symphonium Giant
 7.5
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Everything sounds flat and suffocated, with even elementary passages losing definition and energy. Expect little in the way of micro-details.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble E-
The top end feels muffled, with air and shimmer barely audible. Ambient reverb tails are chopped short.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.

Footer