Softears Volume S VS Tingker Acoustics H16
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Softears Volume S and Tingker Acoustics H16 use 2DD+2BA and 8BA driver setups respectively. Softears Volume S costs $320 while Tingker Acoustics H16 costs $280. Softears Volume S is $40 more expensive. Softears Volume S holds a decisive 4-point edge in reviewer scores (8.5 vs 4.5). Softears Volume S carries a user score of 8.2. Softears Volume S has significantly better mids with a 5-point edge, Softears Volume S has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge and Softears Volume S has significantly better soundstage with a 3-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Softears Volume S | Tingker Acoustics H16 |
|---|---|---|
| Mids | 9 | 4 |
| Treble | 8 | 4 |
| Soundstage | 8 | 5 |
| Dynamics | 5 | 5 |
| Tonality | 7.5 | 4.5 |
| Technicalities | 8 | 4 |
Jaytiss Reviews Comparison
Softears Volume S reviewed by
8.5
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Buy Softears Volume S on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $290
Buy Softears Volume S on HiFiGO
Tingker Acoustics H16 reviewed by
2025-09-30
4.5
Reviewer Score
Softears Volume S Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $320
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Tingker Acoustics H16 Details
Driver Configuration: 8BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $280
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Softears Volume S Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.
Average Technical Grade
A+- A very capable technical display delivers articulate layers and poised imaging. It portrays reverbs and echoes with confidence.
Tingker Acoustics H16 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.
Average Technical Grade
C-- The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Softears Volume S User Reviews
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewA well-rounded, coherent IEM that shines in low-impedance tuning with excellent midrange clarity.
Pros
Balanced, natural midrange with solid bass and rich accessories.Cons
High-impedance mode feels unnecessary and shells may be bulky for small ears.RSV with more bass quantity and better quality, at less than half the price.
Pros
Very nicely balanced sound signature for all-rounder duties, with tonality and technical performance that punches above its price. More even sub - mid bass profile which results in a more cohesive, better textured bass vs harman/meta tuned sets.Cons
Pinna gain isn't an ideal fit for my HRTF, hearing slightly too much upper-mid emphasis after extended listening and comparisons. Upper treble is lacking air vs more expensive sets, most evident in cymbal hits coming across dulled, not unlike the RSVTingker Acoustics H16 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS