Tingker Acoustics H16 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)

IEMRanking.com Jaytiss Ranking User ranking Cyantix Tingker Acoustics H16
My Favorites

Summary

Reviewers consider the Tingker Acoustics H16 to be a polarizing release that rewards specific tastes and shrugs at others. It asks the listener to accept quirks in fit and tone, and in return it offers a unique color. Some will love that trade and others will not.

Tingker Acoustics H16 Details

Driver Configuration: 8BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $280

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Review

2025-09-30
Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Odd for me.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

User Reviews

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Compare Tingker Acoustics H16 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tingker Acoustics H16 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Punch Audio Martilo
 8.6
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
Show MYER SL224
 8.6
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
Show ZiiGaat Crescent
 8.5
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
Show Softears Volume S
 8.5
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
Show Kiwi Ears Astral
 8.5
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
Show Aful Performer 5+2
 8.5
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
Show Ziigaat Odyssey
 8.1
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Letshuoer S15
Letshuoer S15 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
Show Letshuoer S15
 8
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
Show Ziigaat Odyssey 2
 8
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Jays Audio x ZiiGaat Estrella
Jays Audio x ZiiGaat Estrella offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
Show Jays Audio x ZiiGaat Estrella
 7.8
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C-
Expect adequate midrange presence with a touch of grit and unevenness. Textures smear when the mix gets busy.
Treble C-
Treble performance is average, audible but short on refinement. There's acceptable presence but limited finesse.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.

Footer